The Trump phenomenon's most illuminating and characteristic moments – not its most crucial, nor most harsh, nor most threatening, nor most senseless, but possibly its most revealing – occurred earlier this fall. Over the span of a few weeks, the nation's leader started showing everyone his designs for a lavish reception room twice the size of the White House and then began solo dismantling the East Wing portion to erect it.
He has performed deeds ten thousand times worse – the existing assessment of fatalities resulting from his reductions to international aid stands at 600,000 and rising, and this week research forecast his fossil fuel policies would kill 1.3 million more. But nothing as definitional. No former leader would have dared – truly, no former commander would have imagined – solo demolishing large sections of the White House in order to erect a palace-inspired entertainment space, with the direct cooperation of some of America's wealthiest, nearly all of which maintain dealings with federal agencies.
We moved from 'the humble will receive the Earth' toward 'the gentle will succumb from cholera'
As bewildering as it is to observe the leader try to upend the traditional concept of democracy and replace it with its direct contrary, there is one large group of Americans who wouldn't consider it completely novel. That encompasses people such as ourselves – in older age cohorts a near majority – who were raised as mainline Protestant Christians.
We have observed throughout the years as rightwing evangelical churches converted the Savior we learned about into exactly the opposite of our understanding of him. At its most basic, they converted a persona of compassion into a symbol of hate who blesses specifically the brutality that he denounced in the Gospel; this has happened more slowly, across decades as opposed to months, but it is nonetheless unsettling in the same ways, a disorienting gut punch for countless people.
A Toxic Christianity Establishes Itself
So let me first describe the Savior that I grew up with, since in theory the Savior is the core within Christian belief, and since the rapidly expanding group within America may possess limited understanding regarding him since they are atheists or agnostics or spiritual independents. I take no issue with any of these traditions, nor with alternative spiritual paths; but I do think that exist valuable insights of significant worth within Christian narrative.
It is decidedly absolutely not the story of an authoritative monarch arising; rather, a child comes into the world to homeless parents in an automotive shelter, who must quickly flee to a foreign land to evade covert authorities. The infant develops in humble circumstances, a laboring woodworker; his doctrine is about love for fellow humans, specifically for the poor – not merely emotional affection, but a concrete one, shown by providing food and sheltering. The Savior's reaction to hostility is to turn the other cheek – not as a gesture of passive acceptance, but as a means to teach the aggressor; his method regarding offenses indicates that whenever an individual takes your jacket you ought to provide them your pullover as well.
The obvious and straightforward truth that Christ of the gospels calls for a type of profound affection centered on the poor has perpetually caused Christian religion something of a provocative belief system: appealing to the general public, but because of its inherent radicalness demanding to be contained. In the 1950s it was contained by dilution – Protestant Christianity was so prevalent that it practically blessed current circumstances.
A Battle for the Finest Within Us
Hence I have become inspired to witness the steadfast resistance against Trump arise in this past year. It has been substantial consolation to help build the campaign that has demonstrated publicly in rally after rally, and appears to have motivated voters to participate in large quantities in interim political contests. We must have to persist with it, and with identical determination, displaying national flags during all protests and appeals to the finest aspects in US history.
We shall be interrogated ... regarding how you welcomed the foreigner? Did you receive him and embrace them or refuse?
The nation is most protected, essentially, through connection to the highest in US heritage, exactly as the Christian faith is most protected by reference to elements that cause it to be special and beautiful, specifically the model of Jesus. In all circumstances does it imply acting as if the most negative about the nation and Christian faith was nonexistent; it signifies both modesty and faith, a mixture that serious national faithful should be comfortable with.